A native two-way sync connector for Jira.
You pull requirements out of Jira, design your test cases against them, and push the defects you find back to the board. It is built into TechnoCenter, so there is no export to manage and no middleware to license.
Two halves of the same connector: designing tests from Jira, and getting defects back into it.
QA lives in one tool, engineering lives in another — and today the bridge between them is typing. That costs you twice: once when requirements come across, and again when defects go back.
Test case analysis and designJira → TechnoTest · pull
The problem
Requirements live in Jira. Testers re-key epics, features and stories into the test tool by hand — so analysis and design start from a stale copy of what's actually being built, and the link back to the requirement is lost.
How it works with Jira
- Pull the epic → feature → story hierarchy straight into Test Scope, intact
- Analyse coverage and design test cases against the real requirement
- Every test case keeps the Jira key it was designed from
- Requirement changed? Pull again — linked items update, never duplicate
Defect managementTechnoTest → Jira · push
The problem
Defects found in test get re-typed into Jira for the dev team, then the two statuses drift apart — Fixed on one board, Open on the other — until nobody trusts either view.
How it works with Jira
- Log the defect once, against the test case that failed
- Push it to Jira — unlinked defects are created, linked ones updated
- The push is a manual action a person runs — nothing leaves on its own
- Pull dev progress back so the defect reflects the fix
Everything you need to keep two tools telling the same story.
Two-way sync
Pull requirements and Jira items in; push defects and updates back out, from the tool you already test in. The push is a manual action you trigger.
Board-level connections
Each Jira board connects on its own terms. Only a Jira admin or a TechnoCenter admin can view, edit or amend that connection.
A guided sync that shows its work
Scope, resolve, confirm — the same wizard whether you are pulling requirements in or pushing defects out. Filter by epic, story, status, type or assignee, then hand-pick exactly what syncs.
Nothing lands orphaned, nothing lands unseen
Pick a story or a defect and its parents come along, so the requirement hierarchy stays intact. Where both sides disagree, compare them side by side and choose the value to keep, field by field.
One guided flow, three unhurried steps.
Pulling requirements in for test case analysis and design, or pushing defects and updates back out — the sync always walks the same path, so anyone on the team can run it with confidence.
Scope
Confirm the board and direction, filter to what matters, then check the items — the requirements you want to design tests from, or the defects you want on the board. Nothing outside your scope is touched.
Resolve conflicts
TechnoTest compares the shared fields on items that already exist on both sides and surfaces only the disagreements. Accept the default or override any single field.
Confirm and sync
See a full summary — what will be created, updated and resolved, on which side — then commit. A clear record of exactly what moved and why.
Pull what the team is building. Push what your testers find.
Pull from JiraJira → TechnoTest
Bring requirements and Jira items into your test work — the epics, features and stories you'll design test cases against, plus fixes and status changes on defects you've already raised.
- Requirements land as test scope, ready for analysis and design
- Linked items are updated, not duplicated
- New Jira issues are created in TechnoTest
- Your test scope always reflects the latest delivery
Push to JiraTechnoTest → Jira · manual
Send your test-side changes back to the board — most powerfully, the defects your testers log land in Jira for the dev team to pick up.
- Already-linked items are updated in Jira
- Unlinked items are created as new Jira issues
- Developers see new defects without leaving Jira
- Someone chooses to push — it is not automatic
Sync exactly what you mean to — and its whole family.
Pick the direction first: pulling the requirements you want to analyse and design tests from, or pushing the defects you want on the board. Then narrow the board down with real filters and check items off by hand.
Choose an item three levels deep and TechnoTest quietly adds its story, feature and epic — so the requirement hierarchy always lands intact. Everything outside your scope stays untouched.
Filters
When both sides disagree, you decide which value to keep.
For anything that already exists on both sides — a requirement you pulled earlier, a defect you've pushed before — TechnoTest compares only the fields the two systems share and shows you the disagreements. Set a default per board, then override any single field before you commit.
| Field | TechnoTest value | Jira value | Value to keep |
|---|---|---|---|
| Status | In Progress | Done | TechnoTestJira |
| Severity / priority | Medium | High | TechnoTestJira |
| Due date | 2026-07-04 | 2026-06-30 | TechnoTestJira overridden |
See every change before it happens — then commit.
The final step is a plain-English summary of exactly what the sync will do, on which side. Nothing has moved yet. When it looks right, one deliberate click commits it — and the line from requirement to fix closes end to end.
-
Jira requirement → test caseThe story you pulled from Jira is the requirement your test cases were analysed and designed against.
-
Test case → defectThe failing test case links to the defect your tester raised.
-
Defect → Jira issueWhen someone runs the push, that defect becomes a Jira issue the dev team can pick up.
-
Jira progress → back to testAs the dev team moves the linked ticket along their board, the next pull brings that progress back onto the defect in TechnoTest.
Right where testers already work.
Sync isn't a separate app to open — it's one control inside the TechnoTest screens your team uses every day, and it's the same control in both directions.
Test Scope
Pull requirements — epics, features and stories — straight into your test scope, then run analysis and design against them. What you plan to test always tracks what's actually being built.
Defect Log
Pull developer fixes in and push freshly-logged defects out — the round trip that keeps QA and engineering pointed at the same list. The push is triggered from here, by hand.
Both sides of the handover get easier.
Stop re-keying, start testing
- Requirements arrive from Jira — no re-typing epics, features or stories
- Analyse and design against the live requirement, not a copy
- Log a defect once, then push it to Jira when you're ready
- One trusted status, not two guesses
Requirements and fixes flow both ways
- The requirements you wrote in Jira are what QA designs tests from
- QA defects arrive as Jira issues, pushed on demand — never a surprise write
- A clear line from requirement, to test case, to defect, to fix
- Coverage measured against the requirements Jira actually holds
One line runs from the requirement to the fix.
Your requirement starts in Jira, becomes the test cases you design against it, and comes back as a defect your dev team can pick up. Nothing leaves your test tool until someone chooses to send it.